a menu on FFT Social is one question. underneath it sit several dishes — the takes you can vote on — each with its ingredients (pros), gristle (cons), and seasoning (the condition that flips your answer). you taste each one, weigh in, and the stance forms in front of you.
the arc of every FFT Social conversation: you walk up curious, you slow down to think, you leave a little sharper.
a menu is one question — already broken into a few clear dishes you can vote on. politics, sports, markets, science, culture, whatever's on today.
cuisines (geopolitics, economics, climate, …) are the sections of the restaurant. follow the cuisines you care about; ignore the rest.
every dish on the menu is a short, opinionated take. each one comes with its ingredients (the pros), its gristle (the cons), and the seasoning (the condition that flips the answer).
a strong response can prevent a wider conflict by raising the cost of further provocation.
military responses are rarely surgical; collateral damage and proxy retaliation are likely.
unilateral action without nato/regional partners would change my answer to a no.
three buttons, no infinite scroll of replies. tap "depends" to attach a seasoning; your condition joins the dish instead of starting a flame war.
the app rolls your votes into a stance summary — "lean agree", "mixed", "strongly disagree" — with the math visible. it’s your stance, not your team’s. you can revisit it any time, change a single vote, and watch the label move.
